Jump to content
HeartBoard
Sign in to follow this  
kalip

Doubts on Bypass & Angioplasty

Recommended Posts

Study Casts Doubt on Angioplasty, Bypass for Many Heart Patients

 

Bypass operations, angioplasty and the placement of artery-opening stents: For decades, millions of Americans have undergone

these expensive, invasive procedures to help treat clogged vessels.

However, the results of a large and long-awaited clinical trial suggest that, in most cases, these procedures may not have provided any

benefit over medications and lifestyle changes.

In fact, people treated with meds and healthy changes in lifestyle wound up about as healthy as those who underwent an invasive procedure

to open their hardened arteries, researchers reported Saturday at the American Heart Association (AHA) annual meeting in Philadelphia.

 

Only a subgroup of patients who suffered from frequent angina appeared to receive any benefit from an invasive procedure, and that benefit

was in their quality of life, not in lowering their odds of death or future heart problems.

"Based on the trial results to date, I as a clinician would feel comfortable advising my patient not to undergo the invasive strategy if their

angina was absent or controlled or it was tolerated," said Dr. Alice Jacobs, director of the Cardiac Catheterisation Laboratory and Interventional

Cardiology at Boston Medical Centre. She wasn't involved in the new research.

 

Still, doctors are often uncomfortable limiting their treatment of clogged arteries to drugs, diet and exercise alone because they're worried the

patient will wind up suffering a heart attack or other heart-related illness, according to past AHA president Dr. Elliot Antman.

The new findings are expected to give physicians more confidence in saying no to invasive treatments, the experts said.

The study did not focus on people who are admitted to a hospital with a heart attack -- these patients often receive bypass, angioplasty or

stenting to quickly open a blocked artery.

 

Instead, the trial focused on patients with stable but severe heart disease.

A typical patient in this group might be a 71-year-old grandmother who has noticed during the past two months some chest heaviness walking

from the parking lot to her grandkids' soccer game, the AHA presenters said. Stress testing and imaging scans could reveal some moderately c

logged arteries leading to her heart.

 

The new trial was very comprehensive, involving nearly 5,200 patients across 37 countries.

Half were randomly assigned to undergo an invasive procedure:

About three-quarters underwent angioplasty (most receiving a stent as well), while the others had a bypass operation.

The other half of patients were treated with medications and lifestyle changes alone.

Researchers mainly focused on whether the invasive procedure would reduce a patient's risk of heart-related death, heart attack, hospitalisation

with unstable angina, heart failure or cardiac arrest.

 

Overall, an invasive strategy "did not demonstrate a reduced risk over a median 3.3 years" compared with the more conservative, drugs/lifestyle therapy,

said trial co-chair Dr. Judith Hochman, a cardiologist and senior associate dean of clinical sciences at NYU Langone Health, in New York City.

However, invasive procedures did have a positive impact on one patient subgroup: People who regularly suffer the chest pain and shortness of breath

associated with angina, said co-researcher Dr. John Spertus. He directs health outcomes research at Saint Luke's Mid-America Heart Institute in Kansas City.

"For a patient who has weekly angina, there would be 15% of them who would be expected to be angina-free with the conservative approach, while

45% would be expected to be angina-free with the invasive approach," Spertus said. "This is such a large difference that you would only have to treat

about three patients with weekly angina for one to be angina-free at three months."

On the other hand, patients who did not regularly have angina received only minimal quality-of-life or symptom benefits after undergoing an invasive

procedure, Spertus added.

 

A smaller set of trials -- this time focused on patients with chronic kidney disease -- revealed even less promising results, researchers said. Patients didn't

ain any health benefits and didn't have any improvement in their quality of life after getting an invasive treatment. Angioplasty might even help put

them on dialysis earlier or increase their risk of stroke, the study found.

Dr. Glenn Levine, a professor of cardiology with Baylor College of Medicine in Houston, said that when it comes to kidney patients with clogged arteries,

he "will treat them with medical [drug] therapy alone" unless they have marked or uncontrolled angina.

Experts said the main message from these studies is that doctors shouldn't feel pressured to immediately send patients with clogged arteries into a catheterisation

lab, especially if they aren't suffering any symptoms.

 

That could free up physicians to focus on getting patients to take their medications, Jacobs said. If drug therapy helps relieve their occasional angina or other

symptoms, then angioplasty might be avoided in two out of every three patients, she estimated.

The trials were funded by the U.S. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.

 

For more information:

There's more on common heart procedures at the American Heart Association.

 

healthday

 

kalip

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...